Vector Database Reference
Free web tool: Vector Database Reference
| Name | Type | Language | Hybrid | Max Dims | Key Features | Hosting | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinecone | Managed | - | Yes | 20,000 | Fully managed, hybrid search | Cloud | Pay-as-you-go |
| Weaviate | Open Source | Go | Yes | 65,535 | Hybrid search, GraphQL API | Self/Cloud | Open Source+Cloud |
| Qdrant | Open Source | Rust | No | 65,535 | High performance, payload filtering, quantization | Self/Cloud | Open Source+Cloud |
| Milvus | Open Source | Go/C++ | Yes | 32,768 | Distributed, GPU acceleration, large scale | Self/Zilliz | Open Source+Cloud |
| ChromaDB | Open Source | Python | No | 65,535 | Lightweight, built-in embeddings, simple API | Self/Cloud | Open Source |
| pgvector | Extension | C | No | 16,000 | PostgreSQL extension, SQL integration | Self/Cloud PG | Free |
| FAISS | Library | C++/Python | No | N/A | GPU, ultra-fast, quantization | Self (in-memory) | Free |
| LanceDB | Open Source | Rust | No | N/A | Serverless, disk-based | Self/Cloud | Open Source |
| Vespa | Open Source | Java/C++ | Yes | N/A | Hybrid search, real-time indexing, ranking | Self/Cloud | Open Source+Cloud |
| Elasticsearch | Open Source | Java | Yes | 4,096 | kNN search, BM25 hybrid, full-text | Self/Cloud | Open Source+Cloud |
| Redis Vector | Extension | C | Yes | 32,768 | Redis Stack, real-time, low latency | Self/Cloud | Free+Cloud |
| MongoDB Atlas Vector | Managed | C++ | Yes | 4,096 | Atlas integration, document DB + vector | Cloud | Pay-as-you-go |
About Vector Database Reference
The Vector Database Comparison is a searchable reference table that compares eight leading vector database solutions used for AI/ML similarity search, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and embedding-based applications. It covers fully managed services (Pinecone with hybrid search and pay-as-you-go pricing), open-source databases (Weaviate in Go with GraphQL API and hybrid search, Qdrant in Rust with payload filtering and quantization, Milvus in Go/C++ with distributed architecture and GPU acceleration), lightweight solutions (ChromaDB in Python with built-in embeddings), and established tools (pgvector as a PostgreSQL extension with SQL integration, FAISS as a C++/Python in-memory library with GPU support, and LanceDB in Rust with serverless disk-based storage).
Each database entry displays six key comparison dimensions: type (managed service, open source, extension, or library), implementation language, key features (hybrid search, quantization, GPU acceleration, GraphQL API), hosting model (self-hosted, cloud, or both), and pricing structure (open source, free, pay-as-you-go, or hybrid). The searchable interface lets you quickly filter by database name or feature keywords to find the solution that matches your requirements for scale, performance, cost, and operational complexity.
Vector databases are essential infrastructure for modern AI applications that work with embeddings — dense numerical representations of text, images, or other data produced by models like OpenAI, Cohere, or open-source sentence transformers. They enable k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) and approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search at scale, powering use cases like semantic search, recommendation systems, RAG pipelines for LLMs, image similarity, anomaly detection, and drug discovery. This comparison helps developers and architects choose the right vector database by presenting the key tradeoffs in a single, filterable view. All content runs entirely in your browser with no server processing.
Key Features
- Side-by-side comparison of 8 vector databases: Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, ChromaDB, pgvector, FAISS, LanceDB
- Six comparison dimensions per database: type, language, key features, hosting, and pricing
- Searchable and filterable table — find databases by name or feature keywords instantly
- Coverage of all deployment models: fully managed cloud, self-hosted open source, PostgreSQL extension, and in-memory library
- Key feature highlights: hybrid search, GPU acceleration, quantization, payload filtering, GraphQL API, SQL integration
- Pricing model comparison: open source free, cloud pay-as-you-go, and hybrid options
- Implementation language details: Go, Rust, C++, Python, and C for understanding performance characteristics
- 100% client-side — no data is ever sent to a server, works offline after page load
Frequently Asked Questions
Which vector database should I use for a production RAG pipeline?
For a managed, low-ops production RAG pipeline, Pinecone is the simplest option — fully managed with hybrid search (combining dense vector and sparse keyword search) and pay-as-you-go pricing. For self-hosted control with hybrid search capabilities, Weaviate offers a mature solution with a GraphQL API. If you need maximum query performance with advanced filtering, Qdrant (Rust-based) provides payload filtering and built-in quantization for memory efficiency at scale.
What is the difference between Pinecone and open-source alternatives?
Pinecone is a fully managed cloud service — you do not deploy, scale, or maintain any infrastructure. The tradeoff is vendor lock-in and pay-as-you-go costs that scale with usage. Open-source alternatives (Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus) require you to deploy and operate the infrastructure yourself (or use their managed cloud offerings), but give you full control over data, no vendor lock-in, and potentially lower costs at scale. The choice depends on your team's operational capacity and cost sensitivity.
When should I use pgvector instead of a dedicated vector database?
pgvector is ideal when you already have a PostgreSQL infrastructure and want to add vector search without introducing a new database into your stack. It supports ivfflat and HNSW indexes for ANN search directly within PostgreSQL, letting you join vector similarity results with relational data in a single SQL query. The limitation is scalability — pgvector is best for datasets up to tens of millions of vectors. For billions of vectors or when you need distributed sharding, a dedicated solution like Milvus or Qdrant is more appropriate.
What is FAISS and how is it different from a vector database?
FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search) is a library, not a database. It provides highly optimized in-memory vector indexing and search algorithms (IVF, PQ, HNSW) with GPU acceleration, making it the fastest option for pure nearest-neighbor search. However, FAISS has no persistence, no CRUD operations, no filtering, and no built-in distributed mode — it is designed for batch offline workloads or as a building block inside larger systems. Use FAISS when you need maximum raw search speed on a single machine; use a vector database when you need persistence, filtering, real-time updates, and scalability.
What is hybrid search in vector databases?
Hybrid search combines dense vector similarity search (using embeddings from neural models) with traditional sparse keyword search (like BM25/TF-IDF) in a single query. This is important for RAG because pure vector search can miss exact keyword matches (e.g., product codes, names), while pure keyword search misses semantic similarity. Pinecone and Weaviate natively support hybrid search with configurable weighting between dense and sparse scores. With other databases, you can implement hybrid search manually by running both searches and merging results.
How does quantization help with vector database performance?
Quantization reduces the memory footprint of vectors by representing them with fewer bits — for example, scalar quantization converts 32-bit floats to 8-bit integers (4x memory reduction), while product quantization can achieve 10-30x compression. Qdrant and Milvus support built-in quantization. This lets you store more vectors in the same amount of RAM, reduces memory bandwidth during search (improving throughput), and lowers infrastructure costs. The tradeoff is a small loss in recall accuracy, typically 1-3% depending on the quantization method and dataset.
What is LanceDB and when should I choose it?
LanceDB is a Rust-based, serverless vector database that stores data on disk using the Lance columnar format. Unlike other vector databases that require a running server process, LanceDB can be embedded directly into your application (similar to SQLite). This makes it ideal for edge deployments, desktop applications, CI/CD pipelines, and prototyping where you do not want to manage a database server. It supports both self-hosted and cloud modes. The tradeoff is that LanceDB is newer and has a smaller ecosystem compared to Milvus or Weaviate.
Which vector database is best for getting started with AI embeddings?
ChromaDB is the easiest to get started with — it is a Python-native open-source database with built-in embedding functions, so you can store text directly without running a separate embedding model. Install with pip, create a collection, add documents, and query in just a few lines of Python. For production use cases that outgrow ChromaDB, you can then migrate to Qdrant, Weaviate, or Pinecone. pgvector is another beginner-friendly option if you already know PostgreSQL and SQL.