PID Tuning Reference
Free reference guide: PID Tuning Reference
About PID Tuning Reference
The PID Tuning Reference is a comprehensive quick-reference for control engineers, covering five categories: PID Theory (P, I, D individual action descriptions, ISA and parallel PID formulas, performance metrics like rise time, settling time, overshoot, IAE/ISE/ITAE integral criteria, and direct/reverse action selection), Tuning Methods (Ziegler-Nichols ultimate gain and step response methods, Cohen-Coon with dead-time ratio, Lambda tuning for conservative response, IMC Internal Model Control, and SIMC Skogestad rules), Process Identification (FOPDT first-order plus dead-time model parameters K/T/L from step tests, and relay feedback auto-tuning with Ku/Pu extraction), Advanced Features (anti-windup with clamping and back-calculation, bumpless transfer for auto/manual switching, cascade control, feedforward disturbance compensation, Smith predictor for long dead-time processes, split-range control, and ratio control), and Application Examples (real-world tuning of temperature, flow, level, and pressure loops with specific K/T/L values and resulting Kp/Ti/Td parameters).
This reference is intended for process control engineers, automation engineers, instrumentation technicians, and university students in control systems courses. Every tuning method entry includes the complete parameter formulas. For example, the Ziegler-Nichols ultimate gain method gives PID parameters as Kp = 0.6*Ku, Ti = Pu/2, Td = Pu/8. The application examples use realistic process data -- the temperature loop example uses K=2.5 C/%, T=300s, L=30s and walks through the SIMC calculation to arrive at Kp=0.36, Ti=300s with about 5% overshoot.
All content is displayed entirely within your browser. No server computation is required, and the reference works offline once loaded. Dark mode and responsive design ensure comfortable use whether at a control room desk, on a factory floor tablet, or on a mobile phone. No sign-up or installation needed.
Key Features
- P, I, D individual control actions with formulas, characteristics, and practical implications (offset, windup, noise sensitivity)
- ISA (non-interacting) and parallel PID formulas with Ki = Kp/Ti, Kd = Kp*Td, and PB(%) = 100/Kp conversions
- Ziegler-Nichols ultimate gain (closed-loop) and step response (open-loop) tuning tables for P, PI, and PID controllers
- Cohen-Coon tuning formulas that account for dead-time ratio r = L/T, and Lambda tuning for zero-overshoot response
- IMC and SIMC (Skogestad) model-based tuning rules with closed-loop time constant selection guidelines
- FOPDT model identification from step test data (K, T, L extraction) and relay feedback auto-tuning (Ku, Pu calculation)
- Advanced control strategies: anti-windup (clamp and back-calculation), cascade, feedforward, Smith predictor, split-range, and ratio control
- Real-world tuning examples for temperature (K=2.5, T=300s), flow (K=4, T=5s), level (integrating process), and pressure loops with final parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ISA and parallel PID forms?
In ISA (non-interacting) form, u(t) = Kp * [e(t) + (1/Ti)*integral(e) + Td*de/dt], so Ti and Td interact through Kp. In parallel form, u(t) = Kp*e + Ki*integral(e) + Kd*de/dt, where Ki and Kd are independent gains. Convert with Ki = Kp/Ti and Kd = Kp*Td.
How do I perform Ziegler-Nichols ultimate gain tuning?
Set the controller to P-only mode (disable I and D). Gradually increase Kp until you get sustained oscillations. Record the ultimate gain Ku and ultimate period Pu. Then set PID parameters: Kp = 0.6*Ku, Ti = Pu/2, Td = Pu/8. Note this gives aggressive tuning with significant overshoot.
When should I use Lambda tuning instead of Ziegler-Nichols?
Lambda tuning produces zero overshoot and stable response, making it ideal for chemical processes and situations where overshoot is unacceptable. Set Lambda (closed-loop time constant) >= dead time L, typically Lambda = 3*L. The tradeoff is slower response compared to ZN. Use PI: Kp = T/(K*(Lambda+L)), Ti = T.
What is a FOPDT model and how do I identify its parameters?
FOPDT (First Order Plus Dead Time) models a process as G(s) = K*exp(-Ls)/(Ts+1). Perform a step test by changing the output (e.g., 50 to 60%), record the process variable response, then extract K (process gain = delta_PV/delta_MV), T (time constant at 63.2% of final value), and L (dead time from step to first response).
How does anti-windup work?
Integral windup occurs when the output saturates but the integral term keeps accumulating, causing excessive overshoot when saturation ends. Two common solutions: (1) Clamping freezes the integral when output is saturated. (2) Back-calculation computes the saturation error and feeds it back to reduce the integral with a tracking time constant Tt = sqrt(Ti*Td) or Ti.
What is cascade control and how do I tune it?
Cascade uses an outer (master) loop for a slow variable like temperature whose setpoint feeds an inner (slave) loop for a fast variable like flow. Tune the inner loop first (fast, tight response), then tune the outer loop (slower). The inner loop Ti should be less than outer Ti/5 to ensure proper separation.
Why is derivative control usually avoided in flow and level loops?
Flow signals are inherently noisy due to turbulence, so derivative action amplifies noise and causes erratic output. Level control is typically an integrating process where D action is unnecessary and can cause instability. The reference recommends PI-only control for both, with noise filters of 1-3 seconds for flow.
What performance metrics should I target after tuning?
Typical targets are overshoot below 10-25%, settling time (within +/-2% of setpoint) less than 4 times the process time constant, and zero steady-state error. Integral criteria like IAE, ISE, and ITAE provide single-number performance measures for comparing different tuning parameters.